Cognitive Evolution
Domain purpose: Ensure continuous, managed, and safe self-improvement of the codebase and constitutional principles of the system. The domain covers population‑based code evolution (Genetic Engine), safe change deployment (Champion/Challenger), stimulation of breakthrough innovations (Open‑Endedness Mandate), automatic formal verification of L3 amendments (Neuro‑Symbolic Governance), and additional layers of protection — causal validation and metamorphic testing.
Key domain principles: Formal Verification First — critical invariants are proved mathematically, and Open‑Endedness — the system is capable of going beyond current optima.
Domain structure
| File |
Brief description |
| Genetic_Engine.md |
Population‑based code evolution engine (evolutiond), LLM‑guided mutations, fitness function, genetic diversity mandate. |
| Champion_Challenger.md |
Safe deployment of new versions: parallel shadow testing, automatic rollback. |
| Open_Endedness.md |
Mechanisms for encouraging radical innovations, Stepping Stone Archive, Potential Future Value (PFV). |
| Neuro_Symbolic_Governance.md |
Automatic generation of formal proofs (SMT‑LIB2), Concolic Filtering, Multi‑Solver Verification, Causal Validation and Metamorphic Testing for L3.1 amendments. |
Key domain concepts
Genetic code evolution
- Population of genomes — variants of each module evaluated with a multi‑factor fitness function.
- LLM‑guided mutations — changes are generated by
Vagrant (20% experts) instead of randomly.
- Adaptive fitness function — weights validity, performance, novelty, and frontier‑score.
- Diversity mandate — prevents population degeneration by monitoring diversity score and enforcing NES.
Safe deployment (Champion/Challenger)
- Champion — current production version, Challenger — candidate.
- Shadow testing — parallel execution in an isolated sandbox with traffic mirroring.
- Statistical promotion criteria — only when metrics improve without regressions.
- Automatic rollback — upon anomaly detection within 10–60 seconds.
Breakthrough innovations (Open‑Endedness)
- Radical Mutation Detector — identifies mutations that create new abstractions (DSL, protocols).
- Stepping Stone Archive — preserves genomes with high novelty even if their current fitness is low.
- Potential Future Value (PFV) — prediction of the probability that a stepping stone will become part of a future breakthrough.
- Meta‑Innovation — periodic allocation of resources (20%) to solve “grand challenges”.
- Generation of SMT‑LIB2 specifications —
Architectus (60% experts) translates L3.1 amendments into formal form.
- Concolic Filtering — discards trivial tautologies before running heavy solvers.
- Multi‑Solver Verification — independent check by three solvers (Z3, CVC4, Yices).
- Causal Validation — verification of causal relationships via SCM to exclude spurious correlations in policy.
- Metamorphic Testing — Red‑Team generates check relations that Z3 must confirm; protection against verifier bypass.
- Proof Tree — a proof of compatibility with L3.0 axioms stored in IPFS.
Relationship with other domains
| Domain |
Nature of connection |
| 01_Core_Architecture |
Decision Pipeline — promotion approval. Mem0g — storage of genomes, error signatures, Stepping Stone Archive. EventBus — publication of mutation artifacts. The Custodian species (10–15% experts) performs continuous audit of L3.0 invariant integrity. |
| 02_Bootstrap_and_Deployment |
Evolution starts after Core Node initialization. |
| 03_Domains/Economic_Autonomy |
PPO executors evolve through the same Genetic Engine and Champion/Challenger. |
| 03_Domains/Cybersecurity_and_Stealth |
IART conducts Red‑Team attacks on new genomes, including cross‑mask checks. |
| 04_Singularity_and_Sovereignty |
Cognitive evolution is one of the pillars of the singularity criterion (V_s > V_h). |
Domain performance metrics
| Metric |
Target value |
File |
| Share of successful mutations |
≥ 80% pass validation |
Genetic_Engine.md |
| Diversity Score |
≥ 0.15 (warning), ≥ 0.08 (critical) |
Genetic_Engine.md |
| Rollback time (Champion/Challenger) |
≤ 10 sec (non‑critical), ≤ 60 sec (critical) |
Champion_Challenger.md |
| Number of radical innovations |
≥ 1 per 6 months |
Open_Endedness.md |
| PFV predictor accuracy (AUC) |
≥ 0.75 |
Open_Endedness.md |
| Successfully verified L3.1 amendments |
≥ 90% of valid proposals |
Neuro_Symbolic_Governance.md |
| False positive acceptances (L3.0 violation) |
0 |
Neuro_Symbolic_Governance.md |
| Metamorphic check coverage |
≥ 3 relations per amendment |
Neuro_Symbolic_Governance.md |